Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Claude Fable 5.2 · max

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Claude Fable 5.2 · max

73Maintainability

Compared with Claude Fable 5.2 · max

  • dot · Undisclosed

    Maintainability: tiedComparable cost unavailableComparable time unavailable

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortmax
dotBot
EffortUndisclosed
MetricClaude Fable 5.2 · maxdot · Undisclosed
MaintainabilityClaude Fable 5.2max
73
dotUndisclosed
73Tied
OverallClaude Fable 5.2max
94.00
dotUndisclosed
82.80−11.2 pts
Backend engineeringClaude Fable 5.2max
97
dotUndisclosed
85−12 pts
Frontend interactionClaude Fable 5.2max
96
dotUndisclosed
87−9 pts
Knowledge & reasoningClaude Fable 5.2max
100
dotUndisclosed
85−15 pts
Visual aestheticsClaude Fable 5.2max
83
dotUndisclosed
70−13 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.