ModelDial · Private datasets

Datasets and task coverage

ModelDial evaluates backend development, frontend interaction and reasoning on its own private datasets. Below are the tasks, scoring criteria and current results.

Why private datasets

The role and limits of private test data

Leaderboards use different tasks, scoring methods and model settings, so their rankings are not interchangeable. Private test data can complement public benchmarks, but task design and scoring still need scrutiny.

Some benchmarks are nearing their scoring ceiling

Some benchmarks have saturated: when leading models cluster near the scoring ceiling, scores become less useful for distinguishing them. Evaluation needs discriminating tasks and ongoing design and maintenance.

Published questions may enter training data

Published test material can enter training data or be used for benchmark-specific optimization. Private test data can reduce that exposure. A public leaderboard does not necessarily use public test questions.

Publish task coverage, scoring methods and results

ModelDial records backend, frontend and reasoning results separately and publishes task coverage, scoring methods and measured results. Compare generations and reasoning efforts, then relate the evidence to your work.

Keeping data private does not guarantee a good evaluation. Sound tasks, reliable scoring and continued maintenance are also necessary.

Research and industry practice
  1. When AI Benchmarks Plateau

    ICML 2026: nearly half of the 60 benchmarks studied showed saturation. Expert curation mattered for resilience; whether test data was public did not explain it.

  2. LiveBench

    Uses questions from recent material and regularly adds tasks to reduce contamination risks.

  3. Scale · MASK

    Ranks models on a private test split alongside a public split, to monitor overfitting and limit gaming.

Read ModelDial’s scoring methodology
Backend & testing

Business rules and error handling

Rule analysisEdge casesRegression design
Task coverage
Service contracts, retry behavior, CI audits, transaction consistency, caching and regression.
What we check
Identify conflicting or missing rules and produce verifiable solutions, with checks for constraints, edge cases and regression coverage.
Highest recorded score95/ 100 gpt-6-astra · xhigh View the ranking
Frontend & interaction

Interface behavior and state

Build UITrack stateGive feedback
Task coverage
Page implementation, interaction flows, asynchronous selection, query state, responsive layouts and regression.
What we check
Check behavior, state management and interaction feedback against the scoring rules for the task.
Highest recorded score96/ 100 gpt-6-astra · xhigh View the ranking
Knowledge & reasoning

Knowledge and reasoning across disciplines

UnderstandApply knowledgeReason
Task coverage
Mathematics, computer science and AI, physics, engineering, biology and medicine, humanities and social sciences.
What we check
Score answer correctness and retain results by discipline. Scores describe performance on the evaluated tasks.
Highest recorded score100/ 100 claude-opus-5-5 · max View the ranking

How the overall score is calculated

The overall score combines backend (40%), frontend (30%) and reasoning (30%) for one tested configuration. Each axis is scored out of 100; start with the axis relevant to your work.

Read about scoring and updates