Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. Claude Fable 5.2 · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · Claude Fable 5.2 · max
97Backend engineering
Compared with Claude Fable 5.2 · max
- GPT-6.2 Astra · max
Backend engineering: tiedComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 32m 35s (196m 3s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 · max | GPT-6.2 Astra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Backend engineering | Claude Fable 5.2max 97 | GPT-6.2 Astramax 97Tied |
| Overall | Claude Fable 5.2max 94.00 | GPT-6.2 Astramax 93.00−1 pts |
| Frontend interaction | Claude Fable 5.2max 96 | GPT-6.2 Astramax 97+1 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | Claude Fable 5.2max 100 | GPT-6.2 Astramax 95−5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | Claude Fable 5.2max 83 | GPT-6.2 Astramax 83Tied |
| Maintainability | Claude Fable 5.2max 73 | GPT-6.2 Astramax 78+5 pts |
Backend engineering evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Backend engineering evaluation| Metric | Claude Fable 5.2 · max | GPT-6.2 Astra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Claude Fable 5.2max $54.15 | GPT-6.2 Astramax N/A |
| Evaluation time | Claude Fable 5.2max 228m 38s | GPT-6.2 Astramax 32m 35s−85.8% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Claude Fable 5.2max | GPT-6.2 Astramax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Claude Fable 5.2max | GPT-6.2 Astramax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 15 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 22 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Claude Fable 5.2max | GPT-6.2 Astramax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 40 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Claude Fable 5.2max | GPT-6.2 Astramax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | Claude Fable 5.2max | GPT-6.2 Astramax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.