Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) · max

Compare settings
Quick select
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) · max

74.20Overall

Compared with DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) · max

  • QoDuck · xhigh

    Overall: +1.45 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 44m 58s (19m 52s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effortxhigh
MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) · maxQoDuck · xhigh
OverallDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)max
74.20
QoDuckxhigh
75.65+1.45 pts
Backend engineeringDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)max
69
QoDuckxhigh
70+1 pts
Frontend interactionDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)max
91
QoDuckxhigh
80−11 pts
Knowledge & reasoningDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)max
75
QoDuckxhigh
85+10 pts
Visual aestheticsDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)max
61
QoDuckxhigh
64+3 pts
MaintainabilityDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)max
53
QoDuckxhigh
55+2 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.