Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. Gemini 4 Carbon · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · Gemini 4 Carbon · high
89.60Overall
Compared with Gemini 4 Carbon · high
- claude-opus-5-5 · max
Overall: +0.15 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 66m 3s (5m 0s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon · high | claude-opus-5-5 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh 89.60 | claude-opus-5-5max 89.75+0.15 pts |
| Backend engineering | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh 90 | claude-opus-5-5max 81−9 pts |
| Frontend interaction | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh 95 | claude-opus-5-5max 97+2 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh 95 | claude-opus-5-5max 100+5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh 78 | claude-opus-5-5max 73−5 pts |
| Maintainability | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh 68 | claude-opus-5-5max 70+2 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | Gemini 4 Carbon · high | claude-opus-5-5 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh N/A | claude-opus-5-5max $13.41 |
| Evaluation time | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh 71m 3s | claude-opus-5-5max 66m 3s−7% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 19 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 14 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 23 / 25 | 25 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 40 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Carbonhigh | claude-opus-5-5max |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.