Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. GLM-5.3-Flash · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · GLM-5.3-Flash · max
54.45Overall
Compared with GLM-5.3-Flash · max
- GPT-5.6 Luna · max
Overall: −3 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 86m 14s (16m 40s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash · max | GPT-5.6 Luna · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | GLM-5.3-Flashmax 54.45 | GPT-5.6 Lunamax 51.45−3 pts |
| Backend engineering | GLM-5.3-Flashmax 52 | GPT-5.6 Lunamax 61+9 pts |
| Frontend interaction | GLM-5.3-Flashmax 71 | GPT-5.6 Lunamax 74+3 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | GLM-5.3-Flashmax 40 | GPT-5.6 Lunamax 25−15 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | GLM-5.3-Flashmax 70 | GPT-5.6 Lunamax 59−11 pts |
| Maintainability | GLM-5.3-Flashmax 53 | GPT-5.6 Lunamax 61+8 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | GLM-5.3-Flash · max | GPT-5.6 Luna · max |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | GLM-5.3-Flashmax $0.081 | GPT-5.6 Lunamax $0.35 |
| Evaluation time | GLM-5.3-Flashmax 102m 55s | GPT-5.6 Lunamax 86m 14s−16.2% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GLM-5.3-Flashmax | GPT-5.6 Lunamax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 7 / 20 | 7 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 11 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 9 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 11 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 14 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GLM-5.3-Flashmax | GPT-5.6 Lunamax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State continuity | 13 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 8 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 19 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GLM-5.3-Flashmax | GPT-5.6 Lunamax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 5 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 0 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 10 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 15 / 40 | 15 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GLM-5.3-Flashmax | GPT-5.6 Lunamax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | GLM-5.3-Flashmax | GPT-5.6 Lunamax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.