Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. Gemini 4 Hydrogen · xhigh
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · Gemini 4 Hydrogen · xhigh
80.70Overall
Compared with Gemini 4 Hydrogen · xhigh
- GPT-6.1 Terra · max
Overall: +0.35 ptsCost $0.85 ($2.02 less)Evaluation time 21m 30s (0m 21s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | Gemini 4 Hydrogen · xhigh | GPT-6.1 Terra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh 80.70 | GPT-6.1 Terramax 81.05+0.35 pts |
| Backend engineering | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh 83 | GPT-6.1 Terramax 89+6 pts |
| Frontend interaction | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh 85 | GPT-6.1 Terramax 84−1 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh 85 | GPT-6.1 Terramax 85Tied |
| Visual aesthetics | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh 70 | GPT-6.1 Terramax 64−6 pts |
| Maintainability | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh 61 | GPT-6.1 Terramax 61Tied |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | Gemini 4 Hydrogen · xhigh | GPT-6.1 Terra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh $2.86 | GPT-6.1 Terramax $0.85−$2.02 |
| Evaluation time | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh 21m 51s | GPT-6.1 Terramax 21m 30s−1.6% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh | GPT-6.1 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 13 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 17 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh | GPT-6.1 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | — | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | — | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | — | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | — | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | — | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh | GPT-6.1 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 10 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 30 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh | GPT-6.1 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | Gemini 4 Hydrogenxhigh | GPT-6.1 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.