Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. GPT-6 Luna · xhigh
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · GPT-6 Luna · xhigh
61.10Overall
Compared with GPT-6 Luna · xhigh
- Gemini 3.8 Flash · default
Overall: −1.6 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 25m 21s (38m 31s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | GPT-6 Luna · xhigh | Gemini 3.8 Flash · default |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh 61.10 | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault 59.50−1.6 pts |
| Backend engineering | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh 57 | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault 60+3 pts |
| Frontend interaction | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh 78 | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault 84+6 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh 50 | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault 40−10 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh 68 | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault 66−2 pts |
| Maintainability | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh 59 | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault 59Tied |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | GPT-6 Luna · xhigh | Gemini 3.8 Flash · default |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh $0.061 | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault $0.13 |
| Evaluation time | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh 63m 52s | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault 25m 21s−60.3% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 10 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 16 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 9 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 13 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 9 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 13 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | 11 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 17 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 0 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 20 / 40 | 15 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6 Lunaxhigh | Gemini 3.8 Flashdefault |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.