Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-terra · low
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-terra · low
70.70Overall
Compared with gpt-6.1-terra · low
- glm-5.3 · max
Overall: −0.3 ptsReference cost $1.83 ($1.48 more)Evaluation time 153m 15s (144m 45s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · low | glm-5.3 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | gpt-6.1-terralow 70.70 | glm-5.3max 70.40−0.3 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-terralow 53 | glm-5.3max 70+17 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-terralow 80 | glm-5.3max 78−2 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-terralow 85 | glm-5.3max 70−15 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-terralow 53 | glm-5.3max 66+13 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-terralow 64 | glm-5.3max 64Tied |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · low | glm-5.3 · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-terralow $0.35 | glm-5.3max $1.83+$1.48 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-terralow 8m 30s | glm-5.3max 153m 15s+1703.6% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | glm-5.3max |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 13 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 13 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 12 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 15 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 0 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | glm-5.3max |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 15 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | glm-5.3max |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 25 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | glm-5.3max |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 14 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 17 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terralow | glm-5.3max |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.