Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. GPT-6.1 Terra · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · GPT-6.1 Terra · max
81.05Overall
Compared with GPT-6.1 Terra · max
- dot · Undisclosed
Overall: +1.75 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 9m 10s (12m 20s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra · max | dot · Undisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | GPT-6.1 Terramax 81.05 | dotUndisclosed 82.80+1.75 pts |
| Backend engineering | GPT-6.1 Terramax 89 | dotUndisclosed 85−4 pts |
| Frontend interaction | GPT-6.1 Terramax 84 | dotUndisclosed 87+3 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | GPT-6.1 Terramax 85 | dotUndisclosed 85Tied |
| Visual aesthetics | GPT-6.1 Terramax 64 | dotUndisclosed 70+6 pts |
| Maintainability | GPT-6.1 Terramax 61 | dotUndisclosed 73+12 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | GPT-6.1 Terra · max | dot · Undisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | GPT-6.1 Terramax $0.85 | dotUndisclosed N/A |
| Evaluation time | GPT-6.1 Terramax 21m 30s | dotUndisclosed 9m 10s−57.4% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6.1 Terramax | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 17 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6.1 Terramax | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | 13 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6.1 Terramax | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 30 / 40 | 30 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6.1 Terramax | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | GPT-6.1 Terramax | dotUndisclosed |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.