Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.1-terra · max
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.1-terra · max
80.05Overall
Compared with gpt-6.1-terra · max
- k3.1-pro · max
Overall: −0.45 ptsReference cost $5.00 ($4.15 more)Evaluation time 109m 33s (88m 4s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · max | k3.1-pro · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | gpt-6.1-terramax 80.05 | k3.1-promax 79.60−0.45 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.1-terramax 89 | k3.1-promax 84−5 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.1-terramax 84 | k3.1-promax 91+7 pts |
| Knowledge & Reasoning | gpt-6.1-terramax 85 | k3.1-promax 80−5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.1-terramax 64 | k3.1-promax 68+4 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.1-terramax 61 | k3.1-promax 64+3 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.1-terra · max | k3.1-pro · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.1-terramax $0.85 | k3.1-promax $5.00+$4.15 |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.1-terramax 21m 30s | k3.1-promax 109m 33s+409.7% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 17 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & ReasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 30 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.1-terramax | k3.1-promax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.