Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. gpt-6.2-astra · xhigh
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · gpt-6.2-astra · xhigh
92.05Overall
Compared with gpt-6.2-astra · xhigh
- gpt-6.2-sol · max
Overall: −3.15 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 47m 41s (6m 16s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | gpt-6.2-astra · xhigh | gpt-6.2-sol · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh 92.05 | gpt-6.2-solmax 88.90−3.15 pts |
| Backend engineering | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh 94 | gpt-6.2-solmax 96+2 pts |
| Frontend interaction | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh 98 | gpt-6.2-solmax 91−7 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh 95 | gpt-6.2-solmax 95Tied |
| Visual aesthetics | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh 80 | gpt-6.2-solmax 73−7 pts |
| Maintainability | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh 75 | gpt-6.2-solmax 64−11 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | gpt-6.2-astra · xhigh | gpt-6.2-sol · max |
|---|---|---|
| Reference cost | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh $5.31Cost calculation basisEstimated from this evaluation’s token usage at GPT-6 Astra Standard rates: $10 input, $50 output and $1 cached input per million tokens. This is a reference cost for GPT-6.2 Astra, not its quoted price or your actual bill.View reference rates ↗ | gpt-6.2-solmax N/A |
| Evaluation time | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh 53m 57s | gpt-6.2-solmax 47m 41s−11.6% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh | gpt-6.2-solmax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 18 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh | gpt-6.2-solmax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| State continuity | 20 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 15 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 23 / 25 | 21 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh | gpt-6.2-solmax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 10 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 15 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 40 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh | gpt-6.2-solmax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 20 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | gpt-6.2-astraxhigh | gpt-6.2-solmax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 18 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.