Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. Kimi K3 · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · Kimi K3 · high
70.70Overall
Compared with Kimi K3 · high
- GPT-5.6 Terra · max
Overall: −4.65 ptsCost $1.94 ($1.34 less)Evaluation time 133m 2s (25m 15s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | Kimi K3 · high | GPT-5.6 Terra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | Kimi K3high 70.70 | GPT-5.6 Terramax 66.05−4.65 pts |
| Backend engineering | Kimi K3high 65 | GPT-5.6 Terramax 78+13 pts |
| Frontend interaction | Kimi K3high 82 | GPT-5.6 Terramax 76−6 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | Kimi K3high 70 | GPT-5.6 Terramax 55−15 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | Kimi K3high 68 | GPT-5.6 Terramax 61−7 pts |
| Maintainability | Kimi K3high 59 | GPT-5.6 Terramax 61+2 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | Kimi K3 · high | GPT-5.6 Terra · max |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Kimi K3high $3.28 | GPT-5.6 Terramax $1.94−$1.34 |
| Evaluation time | Kimi K3high 158m 17s | GPT-5.6 Terramax 133m 2s−16% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K3high | GPT-5.6 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 14 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 12 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 8 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K3high | GPT-5.6 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 19 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State continuity | 13 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 12 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 19 / 25 | 19 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K3high | GPT-5.6 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 0 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 20 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K3high | GPT-5.6 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 18 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K3high | GPT-5.6 Terramax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.