Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high
62.75Overall
Compared with Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high
- DeepSeek V4 Pro · max
Overall: +0.7 ptsCost $1.15 ($0.49 more)Evaluation time 93m 15s (22m 18s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high | DeepSeek V4 Pro · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 62.75 | DeepSeek V4 Promax 63.45+0.7 pts |
| Backend engineering | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 55 | DeepSeek V4 Promax 64+9 pts |
| Frontend interaction | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 65 | DeepSeek V4 Promax 60−5 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 70 | DeepSeek V4 Promax 65−5 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 57 | DeepSeek V4 Promax 70+13 pts |
| Maintainability | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 53 | DeepSeek V4 Promax 59+6 pts |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high | DeepSeek V4 Pro · max |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high $0.66 | DeepSeek V4 Promax $1.15+$0.49 |
| Evaluation time | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 70m 58s | DeepSeek V4 Promax 93m 15s+31.4% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | DeepSeek V4 Promax |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 9 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 14 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 9 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 8 / 20 | 13 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | DeepSeek V4 Promax |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State continuity | 10 / 20 | 6 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | 7 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 13 / 25 | 15 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | DeepSeek V4 Promax |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 5 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 20 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | DeepSeek V4 Promax |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 16 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 15 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | DeepSeek V4 Promax |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.