Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high
62.75Overall
Compared with Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high
- Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · max
Overall: comparable score unavailableComparable cost unavailableComparable time unavailable
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high | Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · max |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 62.75 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max — |
| Backend engineering | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 55 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max — |
| Frontend interaction | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 65 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max — |
| Knowledge & reasoning | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 70 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max 70Tied |
| Visual aesthetics | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 57 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max — |
| Maintainability | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 53 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max — |
Complete evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Complete evaluation| Metric | Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high | Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · max |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high $0.66 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max N/A |
| Evaluation time | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 70m 58s | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max — |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 9 / 20 | — |
| Retries and failures | 15 / 20 | — |
| CI and adversarial review | 14 / 20 | — |
| Transactions and consistency | 9 / 20 | — |
| Caching and regression | 8 / 20 | — |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 16 / 20 | — |
| Interaction behavior | 16 / 20 | — |
| State continuity | 10 / 20 | — |
| Accessibility and feedback | 10 / 15 | — |
| State validation and regression | 13 / 25 | — |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 5 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 5 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 30 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 16 / 20 | — |
| Spacing and alignment | 17 / 20 | — |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | — |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | — |
| Control styling | 15 / 20 | — |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)max |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 14 / 20 | — |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | — |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | — |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | — |
| Implementation economy | 16 / 20 | — |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.