Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Muse Wonder · max

Compare settings
Quick select
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Muse Wonder · max

59Maintainability

Compared with Muse Wonder · max

  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) · high

    Maintainability: tiedComparable cost unavailableComparable time unavailable

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effort
Effort
MetricMuse Wonder · maxDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) · high
MaintainabilityMuse Wondermax
59
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
59Tied
OverallMuse Wondermax
80.30
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
69.25−11.05 pts
Backend engineeringMuse Wondermax
78
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
60−18 pts
Frontend interactionMuse Wondermax
80
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
81+1 pts
Knowledge & reasoningMuse Wondermax
90
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
70−20 pts
Visual aestheticsMuse Wondermax
73
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
66−7 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.