Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Available modelsSelected 2 / 5
Differences vs. QoDuck · xhigh
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · QoDuck · xhigh
85Knowledge & reasoning
Compared with QoDuck · xhigh
- Claude Sonnet 5.5 · xhigh
Knowledge & reasoning: tiedComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 3m 44s (16m 27s less)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | QoDuck · xhigh | Claude Sonnet 5.5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge & reasoning | QoDuckxhigh 85 | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh 85Tied |
| Overall | QoDuckxhigh 75.65 | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh 81.95+6.3 pts |
| Backend engineering | QoDuckxhigh 70 | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh 84+14 pts |
| Frontend interaction | QoDuckxhigh 80 | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh 86+6 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | QoDuckxhigh 64 | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh 73+9 pts |
| Maintainability | QoDuckxhigh 55 | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh 66+11 pts |
Knowledge & reasoning evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Knowledge & reasoning evaluation| Metric | QoDuck · xhigh | Claude Sonnet 5.5 · xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | QoDuckxhigh N/A | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh $0.13 |
| Evaluation time | QoDuckxhigh 20m 11s | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh 3m 44s−81.5% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | QoDuckxhigh | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 13 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 14 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 17 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 9 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | QoDuckxhigh | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 20 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| State continuity | 8 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 13 / 15 | 15 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 21 / 25 | 17 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | QoDuckxhigh | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 15 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 10 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 35 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | QoDuckxhigh | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 18 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 18 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 16 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | QoDuckxhigh | Claude Sonnet 5.5xhigh |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 17 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 18 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 17 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.