Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. QoDuck · xhigh

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · QoDuck · xhigh

64Visual aesthetics

Compared with QoDuck · xhigh

  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (0910) · max

    Visual aesthetics: tiedComparable cost unavailableComparable time unavailable

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortxhigh
Effort
MetricQoDuck · xhighDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (0910) · max
Visual aestheticsQoDuckxhigh
64
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (0910)max
64Tied
OverallQoDuckxhigh
75.65
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (0910)max
65.55−10.1 pts
Backend engineeringQoDuckxhigh
70
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (0910)max
57−13 pts
Frontend interactionQoDuckxhigh
80
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (0910)max
78−2 pts
Knowledge & reasoningQoDuckxhigh
85
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (0910)max
65−20 pts
MaintainabilityQoDuckxhigh
55
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (0910)max
55Tied

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.