Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen3.8-27B · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen3.8-27B · default

59Maintainability

Compared with Qwen3.8-27B · default

  • DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) · high

    Maintainability: tiedComparable cost unavailableComparable time unavailable

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Effort
MetricQwen3.8-27B · defaultDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017) · high
MaintainabilityQwen3.8-27Bdefault
59
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
59Tied
OverallQwen3.8-27Bdefault
52.55
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
69.25+16.7 pts
Backend engineeringQwen3.8-27Bdefault
59
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
60+1 pts
Frontend interactionQwen3.8-27Bdefault
85
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
81−4 pts
Knowledge & reasoningQwen3.8-27Bdefault
20
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
70+50 pts
Visual aestheticsQwen3.8-27Bdefault
66
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (1017)high
66Tied

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.