Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen3.8-Flash · default

Compare settings
Quick select
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen3.8-Flash · default

55Visual aesthetics

Compared with Qwen3.8-Flash · default

  • LongCat-2.5 · default

    Visual aesthetics: tiedComparable cost unavailableComparable time unavailable

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Effortdefault
MetricQwen3.8-Flash · defaultLongCat-2.5 · default
Visual aestheticsQwen3.8-Flashdefault
55
LongCat-2.5default
55Tied
OverallQwen3.8-Flashdefault
58.90
LongCat-2.5default
61.35+2.45 pts
Backend engineeringQwen3.8-Flashdefault
59
LongCat-2.5default
44−15 pts
Frontend interactionQwen3.8-Flashdefault
70
LongCat-2.5default
62−8 pts
Knowledge & reasoningQwen3.8-Flashdefault
50
LongCat-2.5default
75+25 pts
MaintainabilityQwen3.8-Flashdefault
66
LongCat-2.5default
53−13 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.