Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen3.8-Flash · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen3.8-Flash · default

50Knowledge & reasoning

Compared with Qwen3.8-Flash · default

  • GPT-6 Luna · xhigh

    Knowledge & reasoning: tiedCost $0.026 ($0.25 less)Evaluation time 35m 30s (106m 0s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Effort
MetricQwen3.8-Flash · defaultGPT-6 Luna · xhigh
Knowledge & reasoningQwen3.8-Flashdefault
50
GPT-6 Lunaxhigh
50Tied
OverallQwen3.8-Flashdefault
58.90
GPT-6 Lunaxhigh
61.10+2.2 pts
Backend engineeringQwen3.8-Flashdefault
59
GPT-6 Lunaxhigh
57−2 pts
Frontend interactionQwen3.8-Flashdefault
70
GPT-6 Lunaxhigh
78+8 pts
Visual aestheticsQwen3.8-Flashdefault
55
GPT-6 Lunaxhigh
68+13 pts
MaintainabilityQwen3.8-Flashdefault
66
GPT-6 Lunaxhigh
59−7 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.