Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen3.8-Flash · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen3.8-Flash · default

70Frontend interaction

Compared with Qwen3.8-Flash · default

  • grok-bot · Undisclosed

    Frontend interaction: tiedComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 3m 51s (25m 40s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
EffortUndisclosed
MetricQwen3.8-Flash · defaultgrok-bot · Undisclosed
Frontend interactionQwen3.8-Flashdefault
70
grok-botUndisclosed
70Tied
OverallQwen3.8-Flashdefault
58.90
grok-botUndisclosed
76.45+17.55 pts
Backend engineeringQwen3.8-Flashdefault
59
grok-botUndisclosed
65+6 pts
Knowledge & reasoningQwen3.8-Flashdefault
50
grok-botUndisclosed
95+45 pts
Visual aestheticsQwen3.8-Flashdefault
55
grok-botUndisclosed
68+13 pts
MaintainabilityQwen3.8-Flashdefault
66
grok-botUndisclosed
59−7 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.