Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen 3.8 Max · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen 3.8 Max · default

64Backend engineering

Compared with Qwen 3.8 Max · default

  • k3 · high

    Backend engineering: +6 ptsReference cost $0.89 ($0.18 less)Evaluation time 37m 56s (9m 52s less)

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Efforthigh
MetricQwen 3.8 Max · defaultk3 · high
Backend engineeringQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
64
k3high
70+6 pts
OverallQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
55.50
k3high
71.60+16.1 pts
Frontend interactionQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
69
k3high
85+16 pts
Knowledge & ReasoningQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
40
k3high
70+30 pts
Visual aestheticsQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
64
k3high
68+4 pts
MaintainabilityQwen 3.8 Maxdefault
53
k3high
59+6 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.