Back to rankings

Model comparison

Selected 2 / 5

See the differences. Choose what matters to you.

Differences vs. Qwen4-Max-Preview · default

Compare settings
Quick select
These models share no common effort
Score, cost & time differences

Current baseline · Qwen4-Max-Preview · default

59Visual aesthetics

Compared with Qwen4-Max-Preview · default

  • Claude Haiku 5.5 · xhigh

    Visual aesthetics: tiedComparable cost unavailableComparable time unavailable

Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes

Tested configuration
Effortdefault
Effortxhigh
MetricQwen4-Max-Preview · defaultClaude Haiku 5.5 · xhigh
Visual aestheticsQwen4-Max-Previewdefault
59
Claude Haiku 5.5xhigh
59Tied
OverallQwen4-Max-Previewdefault
78.80
Claude Haiku 5.5xhigh
65.30−13.5 pts
Backend engineeringQwen4-Max-Previewdefault
80
Claude Haiku 5.5xhigh
65−15 pts
Frontend interactionQwen4-Max-Previewdefault
78
Claude Haiku 5.5xhigh
76−2 pts
Knowledge & reasoningQwen4-Max-Previewdefault
90
Claude Haiku 5.5xhigh
60−30 pts
MaintainabilityQwen4-Max-Previewdefault
59
Claude Haiku 5.5xhigh
64+5 pts

Next, validate with your own work

Try a familiar task with each candidate. Compare the results, revision effort, and actual consumption.

Explore subscriptions for these modelsUsing an API? Refer to the evaluation consumption above. For subscriptions, explore matching plans and estimated runtime.