Model comparison
Selected 2 / 5See the differences. Choose what matters to you.
Differences vs. Crouton Alpha · default
Score, cost & time differences
Current baseline · Crouton Alpha · default
64Frontend interaction
Compared with Crouton Alpha · default
- Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high
Frontend interaction: +1 ptsComparable cost unavailableEvaluation time 23m 59s (22m 39s more)
Differences reflect these evaluation tasks. Cost and time cover the same dimension, not a typical conversation. Scoring & cost notes
| Metric | Crouton Alpha · default | Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high |
|---|---|---|
| Frontend interaction | Crouton Alphadefault 64 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 65+1 pts |
| Overall | Crouton Alphadefault 51.95 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 62.75+10.8 pts |
| Backend engineering | Crouton Alphadefault 45 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 55+10 pts |
| Knowledge & reasoning | Crouton Alphadefault 45 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 70+25 pts |
| Visual aesthetics | Crouton Alphadefault 59 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 57−2 pts |
| Maintainability | Crouton Alphadefault 53 | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 53Tied |
Frontend interaction evaluation · Evaluation consumption, not a monthly subscription fee
Cost & time
Frontend interaction evaluation| Metric | Crouton Alpha · default | Kimi K2.8 (Coding) · high |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Crouton Alphadefault N/A | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high $0.25 |
| Evaluation time | Crouton Alphadefault 1m 20s | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high 23m 59s+1705.3% |
Capability profiles
Show up to five models. Select names to focus the chart.
Behind each score
Expand to inspect each subaxis.
Backend engineeringSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Crouton Alphadefault | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high |
|---|---|---|
| Contracts and boundaries | 0 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Retries and failures | 14 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| CI and adversarial review | 9 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Transactions and consistency | 13 / 20 | 9 / 20 |
| Caching and regression | 9 / 20 | 8 / 20 |
Frontend interactionSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Crouton Alphadefault | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high |
|---|---|---|
| Layout and adaptation | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Interaction behavior | 13 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| State continuity | 13 / 20 | 10 / 20 |
| Accessibility and feedback | 9 / 15 | 10 / 15 |
| State validation and regression | 14 / 25 | 13 / 25 |
Knowledge & reasoningSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Crouton Alphadefault | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematical reasoning | 10 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Computer science & AI | 0 / 15 | 5 / 15 |
| Science and engineering | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Life sciences and medicine | 20 / 20 | 20 / 20 |
| Humanities and general knowledge | 10 / 40 | 35 / 40 |
Visual aestheticsSubscores
| Scoring dimension | Crouton Alphadefault | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high |
|---|---|---|
| Composition | 19 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Spacing and alignment | 14 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Typography and expression | 16 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
| Color and surfaces | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Control styling | 16 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.
MaintainabilitySubscores
| Scoring dimension | Crouton Alphadefault | Kimi K2.8 (Coding)high |
|---|---|---|
| Semantic clarity | 15 / 20 | 14 / 20 |
| Control-flow organization | 19 / 20 | 19 / 20 |
| Locality of changes | 15 / 20 | 15 / 20 |
| State and lifecycle | 17 / 20 | 17 / 20 |
| Implementation economy | 15 / 20 | 16 / 20 |
Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.