← Back to model rankings
ModelDial · Model results

Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder · xhigh, showing visual aesthetics. Results for all tested efforts are available below.

Visual aesthetics73

Muse Wonder · xhigh

Backend engineering
72
Frontend interaction
81
Knowledge & reasoning
80
Visual aesthetics
73
Maintainability
57
Evaluation time
—
Cost
—

Visual aesthetics · Evaluation time & API cost

Tasks & methodology

Results by reasoning effort

Swipe to see all results →

Model / effortOverallBackend engineeringFrontend interactionKnowledge & reasoningVisual aestheticsMaintainabilityTotal eval. timeTotal ref. costCompare
65.8567756068599m 50s$2.49
73.60727480685919m 41s$3.30
75.65728180735730m 45s$5.11
80.30788090735940m 8s$6.78

Score breakdown

Overall score
75.65
Evaluation time
30m 45s
Cost
$5.11

Composition, typography, color and control styling in the finished interface.

Composition20 / 20

Visual focus, hierarchy and overall balance.

Spacing and alignment17 / 20

Whitespace rhythm, alignment and spatial consistency.

Typography and expression18 / 20

Type hierarchy, reading rhythm and clear expression.

Color and surfaces19 / 20

Palette, contrast and surface hierarchy.

Control styling16 / 20

Control proportions, consistent details and visual finish.

Subscores retain their original scale; the axis score uses a consistent conversion.

What changes with higher reasoning effort

Compare visual aesthetics scores, cost, and time across neighboring tested efforts.

high xhigh
Visual aesthetics
+5.0 pts
68.00 73.00
Cost
—
— —
Evaluation time
—
— —
View full comparison
Data snapshot published · 11/13/2026Scoring & cost notes