Close-score comparison

Kimi K3 vs GLM-5.3

When totals are close, the five-question profile and repeated batches matter more than declaring a winner from one point.

Current batch

GLM-5.3 / High leads the selected batch by 7 points. GLM-5.3 / High completed 4m 11s sooner. Both configurations have reference-cost coverage.

Open the complete Radar Read the evaluation method

Selected evidence

Published: Aug 26, 2026, 11:00 PM UTC
Question pack: coding-fast-v4.10
Coverage: 2 measured configurations
Batch: snapshot-2026-08-26T23-00-00Z-r3

Same-batch evidence

Measure	Kimi K3 / High	GLM-5.3 / High
Rank	#21	#8
Score	61/100	68/100
Elapsed	27m 47s	23m 35s
Reference cost	$0.44	$0.42
Route	Custom endpoint	Custom endpoint
Black-box Regression Audit	9/20	13/20
Retry Planner Counterexamples	13/20	16/20
CI Adversarial Audit	12/20	12/20
Transaction Regression Design	14/20	15/20
Cache Regression Test Design	13/20	12/20

The decision this comparison can support

Do the two configurations fail on the same capabilities, or does a similar total hide different operational risks?

Start with the score and question profile. Use elapsed time only after both configurations clear your quality floor, and leave cost undecided when either side is not covered.